![]() |
Takoma
DC Growth Plans www.takomadcplan.org |
Official Small Area Plan | Media Coverage |
| Developer Plans | Metro. Branch Trail | ||
| Transportation Study | Update Log Links | ||
October 29, 2001
Ms. Rosalynn Frazier
DC Planning Office
Dear Ms. Frazier:
The below are comments on the Draft Final Report of the Takoma Central District
Plan of September 27, 2001. I want to congratulate and thank the DC Office of
Planning for their efforts in the last 2 years to develop this
plan. It will serve as an excellent guideline for the DC Office of Planning
and the Takoma DC community as we review and comment on future projects in the
area. My comments are listed in the general comment category unless
otherwise stated.
General Comments:
I strongly support the revitalization goals of the draft plan as written particularly
the focus in the 5 priority areas of residential development. Increasing
residential population in these areas will improve safety and more importantly
create the necessary infusion of consumers to support retail in our area. The
concept of "Smart Growth" comes to mind when I view this proposed
plan. The Takoma Metrorail area and surrounding area lends itself to infill
residential projects that support smart growth.
The 5 underdeveloped and vacant parcels focused on as priority areas will be
key in revitalizing our neighborhood. I agree with the proposed densities developed
as appropriate for our existing zoning.
I would strongly add to the guidelines the requirement of "one car parking
space for one residential unit". While the zoning regulations for metrorail
proximity may allow some lesser number, the reality of today's life requires
an automobile for non work trips (i.e. shopping, recreation, job, etc.). Increasing
required parking will also have less impact on the current use of
our very limited street parking by Metrorail commuters and future shoppers.
Additionally, requiring parking lots to have a 50 foot landscaped buffer from
existing residential is very appropriate. It is important to develop transitional
landscape treatments for the area.
The key site in our area is the Takoma Metrorail station and as such I support
the "Village Green" focus. This should be an attractive park-like
area with appropriate street furniture such as a kiosk, benches, and the capability
to host community street fair type events.
In accordance with the goal of enhancing our neighborhood retail , I strongly
urge the use of livable cities standards for our streetscape improvements,
which would require new development to allow preferably 13 foot wide sidewalks
with a 10 foot minimum width for pedestrian safety and comfort while shopping.
I agree with the suggestion of developing an overlay district
to ensure retention of ground floor retail and encourage the city planning
office to pursue this action.
I encourage the city transportation planners to work with metro on enhancing
the access to the area west of the tracks and the appearance of the station
in general.
An effort to eliminate the industrial zoning and land use in our area is
particularly important. I support the C2A zoning designation. One missing
item in the report is the follow on actions. An action should be identified
in the report for how we can reach the goal of the elimination of industrial
land use and zoning, and I encourage the planning office to take the lead
on
this.
Since we are an historic district, I support the "main street" designation
and would add an action item to reach this designation. Associated with this
is the need for a follow on "community development corporation"
of businesses and citizens to oversee and assist in the marketing and implementation
of the 5 priority areas.
Transportation is always an important area. The need for follow on actions
by the District of Columbia Department of Public Works to accomplish neighborhood
transportation plans is very important. These plans would address some of
the issues noted in the plan but also address issues of traffic calming and
specific traffic and parking elements. The most important area which needs
emphasis is the intersection of Blair, Cedar and 4th streets. Making this
intersection as efficient as possible should be a
key goal. This will allow free flow by commuter traffic through our neighborhood.
One specific action is not desired and I would strongly recommend it be eliminated
from the plan. On page 51, alternate 1 recommends closing Blair Road. This
would be a disaster and push commuter traffic to local roads off the Blair
Road arterial. Take this out of the report. However, to make the key intersection
more efficient strong consideration should be given to making 4th Street between
Cedar and Butternut Streets one way south. This would eliminate a turning
movement and cycle on the traffic light at Blair, Cedar and 4th street.
Finally, the plan is lacking an action plan with milestones and designated
action agencies or individuals. This will be particularly important for the
community, the District government, WMATA, and other stakeholders in implementing
our plan.
Thanks again for your efforts. Should you have any questions please contact
me.
Sincerely,
A. R. Giancola, P. E.
Member Citizens Group, Past President Plan Takoma, Past DC Chair of the Gateway
Coalition and founding board member of the Gateway Georgia Avenue Revitalization
Corporation.